Here is an update from the FS blog:
FamilySearch indexers are nearing the end
of their own “Olympic” marathon. Is this the end—or just the beginning
of something even bigger? Let the games begin! After four long years, we
finally get to enjoy another exciting version of that international
celebration of sport known as the Olympic Games. Few events at the
Olympics symbolize human achievement like the marathon. Approximately
26.2 miles in length, the marathon demands exceptional fitness,
incredible determination and a willingness to sacrifice personal well
being to achieve glory for flag and country.
FamilySearch indexers are nearing the end of their own marathon called the 1940 US Census Community Project.
It’s been a challenge, but incredibly, we’ve broken records with every
step. Now we’re in the final stretch with the finish line rapidly
approaching. Glory awaits, but as every athlete knows, you have to “push
through the tape” and cross the finish line before the race is won. If
our “race” continues to go as well as it has, indexers and arbitrators
will reach the finish within days.
Olympic marathoners end their race on the track inside the main
Olympic stadium. When the first runner clears the service tunnel leading
from the streets outside the stadium and begins to “kick” toward the
finish one-half lap away, thousands of fans erupt in a deafening cheer.
It is a spine-tingling moment, charged with emotion. After more than two
hours of intense individual effort, suddenly there are tens of
thousands to help push weary legs the final 300 meters.
The adrenaline rush in those moments is exhilarating and the
race-ending flood of emotions, ranging from relief to amazement to sheer
ecstasy, can be overwhelmingly powerful. It’s that same well-deserved
feeling we would wish for every 1940 US Census Community Project indexer
and arbitrator who has tenaciously stuck with this marathon indexing
effort from the starting gun to the finish line.
To you who have given your all to this project and tirelessly pushed
through the indexing equivalent of heavy legs, shortness of breath, and
doubts about your ability to endure, we can only hope in these final
days of the project that you can somehow feel the silent but
enthusiastic cheers of the literally tens of millions who are the
recipients of your great gift.
The Victor’s Crown
The traditional symbol of Olympic victory is a gold medal, but anciently
the symbol was the laurel wreath, woven from the supple branches and
leaves of a wild olive tree. The 1940 US Census Community
Project represents a major victory. Only the most wildly optimistic
individuals would have suggested that the entire census could be indexed
and arbitrated in less than 4½ months. But that’s precisely what we,
the genealogical community, have done. It’s an achievement without
parallel.
Among the project’s myriad astonishing statistics is the number of people who contributed to the creation of the US 1940 Census index.
To date that number is hovering near 155,000—enough to make a
decent-sized city—and it continues to climb even as we head into the
home stretch. The enthusiasm for this project and for indexing in
general is such an inspiration!
For all who have participated, from those who arbitrated thousands of names to those who indexed a single batch, we offer the victor’s laurel, a badge
you can proudly display to show your part in making history. More
celebrating lies ahead, but that can wait until we all cross the finish
line together as the last of the full index is published to the world.
Stay tuned for more about that in the near future.
The Start of a New Trend?
For now, let’s consider one of the “unintended consequences” of the 1940
US Census Community Project and another comparison to the Olympic
marathon. The year was 1972. The setting was Munich, Germany. From the
field of more than 70 competitors, a relatively unknown American named
Frank Shorter emerged and surprised the world by beating the rest of the
field by more than two minutes. His stunning victory was such an
inspiration to Americans that it fueled a national running craze that
continues to this day.
Great moments in history can inspire generations to take action and
accomplish even greater feats. What greater achievements will the memory
of the 1940 US Census Community Project inspire? Already it has swept
up more participants than any other project of its type in history, but
there are billions of additional records still waiting to be indexed.
Could the 1940 US Census experience mark the beginning of a new culture
of group giving in the genealogical community? We now know what we’re
capable of accomplishing—is there any reason we shouldn’t just continue?
If your answer to that question is a resounding, “NO!,” then you’ll be pleased to learn about the US Immigration & Naturalization Community Project.
It’s the sequel to the 1940 US Census project and records from this
project are already available for indexing (just look for the “US
(Community Project)” label).
If you need a rest from the “marathon,” everyone will understand. But
if you’re thinking the 1940 US Census was just a good warm up and are
wondering just how much more we can accomplish in the future, then get
on board and full steam ahead! The race to remember our immigrant
ancestors has just begun!
Monday, July 30, 2012
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Finances
This is a report by the Church that should be of interest to those in Genealogy Community
Commentary — 12 July 2012
The Church and Its Financial Independence
Salt Lake City —
The
growth of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from a
fledgling band of frontier Americans to a global faith that blesses the
lives of millions is one of the great religious success stories of the
19th and 20th centuries.
From the very beginning, members of the Church displayed a remarkable ability to set aside material things for spiritual goals. One of the earliest Church members, Martin Harris, mortgaged his farm to pay for the publication of the Book of Mormon. Other examples of self-sacrifice among the early Latter-day Saints abound.
Driven from place to place — from Missouri to Illinois to the far reaches of the western frontier — Church members several times abandoned their homes, farms and cottage businesses they had lovingly nurtured. By the time they made the final great trek across the American Plains to the Rocky Mountains, many were already impoverished. Those who came by handcarts because they could not afford wagons are a poignant testimony to that fact.
Brigham Young once remarked that if the Latter-day Saints could have 10 years unmolested in the Rocky Mountain valleys, they would establish themselves as an independent people. Over time, Brigham Young’s vision of a thrifty, independent and spiritual people largely came to be realized.
Complete financial independence and freedom from debt would take several decades, however. Historians today point to the early 1900s as the time when the Church finally began to turn the corner and free itself from decades of indebtedness — specifically highlighting a sermon by Church President Lorenzo Snow in which he called on the Latter-day Saints to renew their commitment to the principle of tithing.
Tithing is an ancient biblical principle and has been practiced by many churches through the centuries. Independent studies show, however, that nowhere else in America today is the principle of tithing so widely and faithfully followed as among members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The vast majority of the income used to manage the Church comes from tithing, not from businesses or investments.
Tithing has thus proved to be an enormous blessing to the Church and its people, along with simple but sound economic principles such as avoiding debt, living within one’s means and setting aside funds for a rainy day.
The key to understanding Church finances is to understand that they are a means to an end. They allow the Church to carry out its religious mission across the world.
Does the Church own for-profit businesses? Yes. In the Church’s earlier history as it was establishing itself in the remote Intermountain West, some of those businesses were necessitated by the simple fact that they didn’t exist elsewhere in the community. Gradually, as private businesses developed and the need for Church-owned businesses diminished, they were sold off, donated to the community or discontinued. Zions Bank and the LDS Hospital system are examples.
Today, the Church’s business assets support the Church’s mission and principles by serving as a rainy day fund. Agricultural holdings now operated as for-profit enterprises can be converted into welfare farms in the event of a global food crisis. Companies such as KSL Television and the Deseret News provide strategically valuable communication tools.
Tithing funds are used to support five key areas of activity:
On occasion someone will try to estimate the Church’s income and determine how much of that is used to care for the poor and needy. Again, they rarely capture the whole picture. The bedrock principles underlying the Church’s welfare and humanitarian efforts are Christlike service and self-reliance.
Nearly 30,000 bishops who oversee their respective congregations have direct access to Church funds to care for those in need, as they help members achieve self-sufficiency.
At Welfare Square in Salt Lake City, where the Church cans goods for its distribution warehouses, some procedures would be more efficient if automated. Instead, the Church has opted for more labor-intensive production lines that provide opportunities for people to give service and for welfare recipients to work for what they get. This is not the pattern of a commercial business, but it is the pattern for helping people to help themselves. The Church’s aim is to help individuals to overcome temporal barriers as they pursue spiritual values.
Published numbers related to our humanitarian efforts include only dollars spent directly on humanitarian service. The Church absorbs the administrative costs. Furthermore, these numbers do not reflect the Church’s extensive welfare and employment services that serve many thousands worldwide. They also do not represent Deseret Industries thrift stores that provide vouchers to other charities for their use, donations to food pantries, or humanitarian- or welfare-focused missionary service or support given to aid other relief organizations in their missions. Hundreds of thousands of hours of donated service underpin Church programs such as these.
The Church exists to improve the lives of people across the world by bringing them closer to Jesus Christ. The assets of the Church are used in ways to support that mission. Buildings are built for members to come together to worship God and to be taught the gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionaries are sent to invite people to come to Christ. Resources are used to provide food and clothing for the needy and to provide ways for people to lift themselves up and be self-reliant. What is important is not the cost but the outcome. As former Church President Gordon B. Hinckley said, “The only true wealth of the Church is in the faith of its people.”
Those who attempt to define the Church as an institution devoted to amassing monetary wealth miss the entire point: the Church’s purpose is to bring people to Christ and to follow His example by lifting the burdens of those who are struggling. The key to understanding the Church is to see it not as a worldwide corporation, but as millions of faithful members in thousands of congregations across the world following Christ and caring for each other and their neighbors.
From the very beginning, members of the Church displayed a remarkable ability to set aside material things for spiritual goals. One of the earliest Church members, Martin Harris, mortgaged his farm to pay for the publication of the Book of Mormon. Other examples of self-sacrifice among the early Latter-day Saints abound.
Driven from place to place — from Missouri to Illinois to the far reaches of the western frontier — Church members several times abandoned their homes, farms and cottage businesses they had lovingly nurtured. By the time they made the final great trek across the American Plains to the Rocky Mountains, many were already impoverished. Those who came by handcarts because they could not afford wagons are a poignant testimony to that fact.
Brigham Young once remarked that if the Latter-day Saints could have 10 years unmolested in the Rocky Mountain valleys, they would establish themselves as an independent people. Over time, Brigham Young’s vision of a thrifty, independent and spiritual people largely came to be realized.
Complete financial independence and freedom from debt would take several decades, however. Historians today point to the early 1900s as the time when the Church finally began to turn the corner and free itself from decades of indebtedness — specifically highlighting a sermon by Church President Lorenzo Snow in which he called on the Latter-day Saints to renew their commitment to the principle of tithing.
Tithing is an ancient biblical principle and has been practiced by many churches through the centuries. Independent studies show, however, that nowhere else in America today is the principle of tithing so widely and faithfully followed as among members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The vast majority of the income used to manage the Church comes from tithing, not from businesses or investments.
Tithing has thus proved to be an enormous blessing to the Church and its people, along with simple but sound economic principles such as avoiding debt, living within one’s means and setting aside funds for a rainy day.
The key to understanding Church finances is to understand that they are a means to an end. They allow the Church to carry out its religious mission across the world.
Does the Church own for-profit businesses? Yes. In the Church’s earlier history as it was establishing itself in the remote Intermountain West, some of those businesses were necessitated by the simple fact that they didn’t exist elsewhere in the community. Gradually, as private businesses developed and the need for Church-owned businesses diminished, they were sold off, donated to the community or discontinued. Zions Bank and the LDS Hospital system are examples.
Today, the Church’s business assets support the Church’s mission and principles by serving as a rainy day fund. Agricultural holdings now operated as for-profit enterprises can be converted into welfare farms in the event of a global food crisis. Companies such as KSL Television and the Deseret News provide strategically valuable communication tools.
Tithing funds are used to support five key areas of activity:
- Providing buildings or places of worship for members around the world. We have thousands of such buildings and continue to open more, sometimes several in a week.
- Providing education programs, including support for our universities and our seminary and institute programs.
- Supporting the Church’s worldwide missionary program.
- Building and operating nearly 140 temples around the world and the administration of the world’s largest family history program.
- Supporting the Church’s welfare programs and humanitarian aid, which serve people around the world — both members of the Church as well as those who are not members.
On occasion someone will try to estimate the Church’s income and determine how much of that is used to care for the poor and needy. Again, they rarely capture the whole picture. The bedrock principles underlying the Church’s welfare and humanitarian efforts are Christlike service and self-reliance.
Nearly 30,000 bishops who oversee their respective congregations have direct access to Church funds to care for those in need, as they help members achieve self-sufficiency.
At Welfare Square in Salt Lake City, where the Church cans goods for its distribution warehouses, some procedures would be more efficient if automated. Instead, the Church has opted for more labor-intensive production lines that provide opportunities for people to give service and for welfare recipients to work for what they get. This is not the pattern of a commercial business, but it is the pattern for helping people to help themselves. The Church’s aim is to help individuals to overcome temporal barriers as they pursue spiritual values.
Published numbers related to our humanitarian efforts include only dollars spent directly on humanitarian service. The Church absorbs the administrative costs. Furthermore, these numbers do not reflect the Church’s extensive welfare and employment services that serve many thousands worldwide. They also do not represent Deseret Industries thrift stores that provide vouchers to other charities for their use, donations to food pantries, or humanitarian- or welfare-focused missionary service or support given to aid other relief organizations in their missions. Hundreds of thousands of hours of donated service underpin Church programs such as these.
The Church exists to improve the lives of people across the world by bringing them closer to Jesus Christ. The assets of the Church are used in ways to support that mission. Buildings are built for members to come together to worship God and to be taught the gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionaries are sent to invite people to come to Christ. Resources are used to provide food and clothing for the needy and to provide ways for people to lift themselves up and be self-reliant. What is important is not the cost but the outcome. As former Church President Gordon B. Hinckley said, “The only true wealth of the Church is in the faith of its people.”
Those who attempt to define the Church as an institution devoted to amassing monetary wealth miss the entire point: the Church’s purpose is to bring people to Christ and to follow His example by lifting the burdens of those who are struggling. The key to understanding the Church is to see it not as a worldwide corporation, but as millions of faithful members in thousands of congregations across the world following Christ and caring for each other and their neighbors.
Saturday, July 7, 2012
1940 Census report
Here is the latest report from FamilySearch:
No new states have been posted this week. States such as New York and a few others are so big that they take a lot of processing at the back end to make them searchable. Please be patient as we get them ready to post. I know that we are all excited to see new states posted, especially if it’s been a state you’ve been working on. We want to make sure they are as error free as possible and sometimes that takes a little extra time.
Below are the latest statistics for the project. They continue to be very encouraging.
No new states have been posted this week. States such as New York and a few others are so big that they take a lot of processing at the back end to make them searchable. Please be patient as we get them ready to post. I know that we are all excited to see new states posted, especially if it’s been a state you’ve been working on. We want to make sure they are as error free as possible and sometimes that takes a little extra time.
Below are the latest statistics for the project. They continue to be very encouraging.
- 115,886,258 names have been indexed and arbitrated.
- 29 states have searchable indexes on FamilySearch.org. These states include Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wyoming.
- 4 additional states are 100% indexed and arbitrated and are in the final stage in preparation for posting.
- 5 additional states are 90% or more indexed and arbitrated.
- 14 states are 50% or more indexed.
- 4 states are still less than 50% indexed. To see the status of each state visit the 1940 US Census state-by-state progress map on the FamilySearch website.
- The 1940 US Census is currently 82% indexed and arbitrated.
- 150,990 indexers have signed up to index the 1940 US Census.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Records preservation
This is a copy of a blog post on record preservation that I believe you will find interesting from FamilySearch:
The LDS Church has been a pioneer for many decades in preserving important family history records, keeping them safe from the dangers of both man and nature. It took many years to build the Granite Mountain Records Vault, where microfilm records are safely kept today. But what about all this digital information that Family Search is generating to assist researchers on the Internet –how does that get preserved from generation to generation? As you might imagine, digital content is a bit more complex and fragile than microfilm to preserve long term. Digital preservation is a lot more than just tape backup. Let’s explore some of the nuances and complexities of long-term, digital preservation.
Volume of data: the digital pipeline in Family Search is generating somewhere in the range of 15 terabytes of images, or one million to three million pages digitally every business day of the year. The software to handle this volume did not exist when we started digital preservation. We push many of our vendors to come up with new technology to meet our needs as we stretch their capabilities and often break their products. We are also writing our own magnetic tape storage software because no products exist on the market that can handle preservation storage volume of this magnitude.
Data validation: on an annual basis, the preservation system has to be automated to check all the bits on every tape and make sure that there is no corruption. We store checksum values at multiple levels so the software can read the checksum, read the data, and compare the calculations to ensure integrity. It is very resource intensive to deploy tape drives for writing new data, while also using drives for the annual validation of every tape. It takes complex scheduling to balance the work between the two and assure that we don’t go too long without touching each tape for validation.
Media refresh: as the tape media ages, the system needs the ability to make copies on to new media, before unrecoverable errors begin to appear. There is no way to tell exactly when tapes will begin to fail, so the software has to keep a database of errors for every tape and every tape drive and look for trends that indicate a coming problem before they actually occur. If we rotate media too often, however, the system becomes too costly to maintain.
File format migration: do you have any WordPerfect 4.2 files lying around? How about a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet or even something more obscure, where the software vendor is long gone, along with your installation disks? As years pass, the risk of not being able to accurately read a data file increases. Our preservation system has to account for this and be able to convert files from one format or version to a newer format. If files are not migrated in a timely fashion, massive amounts of data can become inaccessible or difficult to render accurately. Some file formats may be viable for a decade or more, while others could become obsolete within just a few short years or less. Is a PDF a viable rendering of an Excel spreadsheet? What about the underlying formulas, fonts, supporting data, and links to data sources? There is a significant risk of losing content whenever a file format is converted to a new format.
Metadata and descriptive data: so you have a file from 5 years ago…who created it? What software version is required to read it? Where was the image originally digitized? Who is the owner of the original? Are there any restrictions on the use of the file in the future? Is this copy the highest resolution version we own, or is there a better image somewhere? What is the subject matter of the file? Are there people in the photograph? Is there important genealogical data contained in the image? The list of important questions goes on and on. Keeping track of the many types of metadata, indexes, and associated descriptive data is critical for our preservation system.
Documentation: a preservation system serves both currently living persons as well as future generations. We often pull images from preservation to avoid having to rescan originals or microfilm in the digital pipeline. A professional genealogist may need to see our highest resolution copy of an image to get clarity around handwriting. A future generation may have to open up our protected vaults and try to recover as much information as they can from our tape libraries and try to rebuild the family history information we have attempted to preserve. Documentation is a critical component of digital preservation. It is imperative that we document our data models, file formats, technology standards, software code, hardware specifications, and many, many other aspects of the digital preservation system. A future archeologist will not be able to simply put a magnifying glass up to microfilm to view our digital artifacts.
There are many additional complexities associated with operating a trusted digital repository. Hopefully, this article gives you some insights into some of them and helps you appreciate the efforts FamilySearch is taking to ensure that future generations are handed a pristine copy of their family records. We have not yet solved all of the challenges associated with building our preservation system –a task that will take many more years and possibly decades to prove out. We take our work very seriously and have a dedicated team of professionals looking after the world’s records. With contributions from many, we hope to enable future generations to learn of their heritage and make the same precious bond with their ancestors as we have.
The LDS Church has been a pioneer for many decades in preserving important family history records, keeping them safe from the dangers of both man and nature. It took many years to build the Granite Mountain Records Vault, where microfilm records are safely kept today. But what about all this digital information that Family Search is generating to assist researchers on the Internet –how does that get preserved from generation to generation? As you might imagine, digital content is a bit more complex and fragile than microfilm to preserve long term. Digital preservation is a lot more than just tape backup. Let’s explore some of the nuances and complexities of long-term, digital preservation.
Volume of data: the digital pipeline in Family Search is generating somewhere in the range of 15 terabytes of images, or one million to three million pages digitally every business day of the year. The software to handle this volume did not exist when we started digital preservation. We push many of our vendors to come up with new technology to meet our needs as we stretch their capabilities and often break their products. We are also writing our own magnetic tape storage software because no products exist on the market that can handle preservation storage volume of this magnitude.
Data validation: on an annual basis, the preservation system has to be automated to check all the bits on every tape and make sure that there is no corruption. We store checksum values at multiple levels so the software can read the checksum, read the data, and compare the calculations to ensure integrity. It is very resource intensive to deploy tape drives for writing new data, while also using drives for the annual validation of every tape. It takes complex scheduling to balance the work between the two and assure that we don’t go too long without touching each tape for validation.
Media refresh: as the tape media ages, the system needs the ability to make copies on to new media, before unrecoverable errors begin to appear. There is no way to tell exactly when tapes will begin to fail, so the software has to keep a database of errors for every tape and every tape drive and look for trends that indicate a coming problem before they actually occur. If we rotate media too often, however, the system becomes too costly to maintain.
File format migration: do you have any WordPerfect 4.2 files lying around? How about a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet or even something more obscure, where the software vendor is long gone, along with your installation disks? As years pass, the risk of not being able to accurately read a data file increases. Our preservation system has to account for this and be able to convert files from one format or version to a newer format. If files are not migrated in a timely fashion, massive amounts of data can become inaccessible or difficult to render accurately. Some file formats may be viable for a decade or more, while others could become obsolete within just a few short years or less. Is a PDF a viable rendering of an Excel spreadsheet? What about the underlying formulas, fonts, supporting data, and links to data sources? There is a significant risk of losing content whenever a file format is converted to a new format.
Metadata and descriptive data: so you have a file from 5 years ago…who created it? What software version is required to read it? Where was the image originally digitized? Who is the owner of the original? Are there any restrictions on the use of the file in the future? Is this copy the highest resolution version we own, or is there a better image somewhere? What is the subject matter of the file? Are there people in the photograph? Is there important genealogical data contained in the image? The list of important questions goes on and on. Keeping track of the many types of metadata, indexes, and associated descriptive data is critical for our preservation system.
Documentation: a preservation system serves both currently living persons as well as future generations. We often pull images from preservation to avoid having to rescan originals or microfilm in the digital pipeline. A professional genealogist may need to see our highest resolution copy of an image to get clarity around handwriting. A future generation may have to open up our protected vaults and try to recover as much information as they can from our tape libraries and try to rebuild the family history information we have attempted to preserve. Documentation is a critical component of digital preservation. It is imperative that we document our data models, file formats, technology standards, software code, hardware specifications, and many, many other aspects of the digital preservation system. A future archeologist will not be able to simply put a magnifying glass up to microfilm to view our digital artifacts.
There are many additional complexities associated with operating a trusted digital repository. Hopefully, this article gives you some insights into some of them and helps you appreciate the efforts FamilySearch is taking to ensure that future generations are handed a pristine copy of their family records. We have not yet solved all of the challenges associated with building our preservation system –a task that will take many more years and possibly decades to prove out. We take our work very seriously and have a dedicated team of professionals looking after the world’s records. With contributions from many, we hope to enable future generations to learn of their heritage and make the same precious bond with their ancestors as we have.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)